The betting contract must contain the promise to pay money or money. On August 14, 1942, the defendant submitted another written statement arguing that the allegations in paragraph 2 were unfounded and that the applicants` case, based on the alleged aforementioned dissolution, could not be upheld, as no date of alleged dissolution had been mentioned in the motion. It is apparent from the above submissions that, although an express allegation of dissolution of the partnership was made only by an amendment on November 17, 1941, the original motion contained all the facts underlying that plea. In their written statement, the defendant denied, among other things, that there was a partnership to enter into futures contracts with the two aforementioned traders and that they therefore had not expressly disputed the above facts, in accordance with their case. The above facts, with the exception of whether the partnership between the two families or only between the two family directors, on which opinions were different between the subordinate judge`s court and the Supreme Court, were established simultaneously by both courts. These findings show that the partnership existed only for two-person futures and for a given season. But it is said that these findings were not based on any evidence in the case. Although the documents did not contain a clear indication of a period limiting the operation of the partnership, the position of the 413 defendants in the earlier appeal, which ended in an arbitration award and which was accepted in these letters, the nature of the transactions and the conduct of the parties, did not lead to any conclusions other than that of the High Court. In this case, the Partnership Act applies directly to the publication of the Partnership Act. Under this section, if a company does not have a contrary contract, it is terminated by the conclusion of the contract, if it is in the process of carrying out one or more adventures or undertakings. In this case, the partnership was formed to execute contracts with certain people during a given season and, since those contracts were concluded, the partnership was broken.