Cooperative Agreement Versus Grant

A cooperation agreement can be a highly specialized research award, in which federal employees are among the relatively few experts in this field. In this case, the award can be defined as a „cooperation agreement,“ since federal officials and non-federal recipients will conduct the joint research in one way or another. Dave, yes, they can be. But it really depends on the specific funding possibility – which is the main purpose of the grant. As long as the grant achieves this goal, funding can support all or part of a 508-compliant website. For other questions, we advise you to contact the grant funding agency or the cooperation agreement concerned, as we are not in a position to provide binding answers to this question. Subsidies and cooperation agreements are not the same, and the differences affect every step of the fund-seeking process, from pre-allocation to post-price. In many ways, cooperative agreements are similar to federal grants. Under the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977 (FGCAA), the main objective of the two relationships is to transfer the value of federal organizations to public, local and private organizations.

Cooperation agreements differ from grants in the degree of follow-up expected by federal and non-federal institutions. The federal shareholder, who manages a subsidy, generally assumes a purely supervisory function as soon as the grant is granted, but the contracting entity in a cooperation contract „essentially“ participates in the carrying out of the public activity. A practical understanding of the different financial instruments. From pre-award decision to post-award management, you will explore key elements of both grants and cooperation agreements, including the active participation of the federal agency itself. You also have the option to ask your own questions during the Q-A part of the webinar. With regard to cooperation agreements, a significant participation is expected between the IJ and the winner. The fellow is required to cooperate with the NIJ Grant Manager, who is the authorized representative of NIJ, who is responsible for the proper management of the prize. In addition, an NIJ scientist is responsible for collaborating with the recipient`s researchers on substantive issues related to the award – support, advice, coordination and participation in project activities to ensure success. The NIJ scientist may also publish and be present with the recipient`s investigators as representatives of the NIJ. Federal authorities use purchase contracts and various forms of financial assistance (subsidies, cooperation agreements and others) to transfer funds to individuals and organizations in order to achieve the Agency`s authorized mission.

As far as grants are concerned, significant participation between the NIJ and the winner should not be expected. The fellow is required to cooperate with the NIJ grant manager, who is the authorized representative of nij, who is responsible for the proper management of the grant. In addition, if the fellow chooses to engage INI scientists in contributions and advice on substantive financial aid issues (e.g. B the examination of the instruments, the translation of information in the field, on the basis of publication sites), the scholar will be able to access NIJ researchers at no cost to the fellow.